![]() How are both of these things handled in Sam? > I use tons of VSTis in my work, as well as ACID loops, etc. Do I need spend three THOUSAND dollars on Sequoia so I can use video? I need to be able to shift timecode references to the video, and the like, but I don't need actual video editing capability, really. > I know that Sequoia has a much more advanced video engine, but all I need is to be able to import QT videos and work to them, locked to the project. I'm 100% willing to learn a new way of working, as long as it's very fast and intuitive once you get it. I work extremely fast, and it's important for me to have a very smooth and fast interface, technically - doing tons of mouse clicks to get one simple thing done doesn't work for me, and Cubase is pretty good in that regard. > I know that the workflow in Sam is different.I'd like to hear from some ex-Cubase users here in that regard. I come from a very strong engineering background, and know my stuff in that regard. ![]() I've been on Cubase for about 5 years now, and I feel abandoned by the company.I just can't take it anymore. ![]() I also do a lot of songs for movies, etc.so it runs the gamut. I score a number of TV shows (some of which many of you might watch, who knows!) and do awards shows for MTV and the like. Hello all.I have heard nothing but fantastic things about Samplitude and about the forums here.very different from Cubase right now.Ī short history (bear with me): I'm a professional composer who lives in smoggy L.A.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |